Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on February 5, 2022 at 9:21am

Not authentic IMO.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on February 5, 2022 at 11:14am

Nope....

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by a pug called eva on February 5, 2022 at 11:48pm

Perhaps we are being a little hasty. It reminds me of the QEII example that was discussed so much on this forum a few years ago. It was agreed that the inscription was in another hand. Here's a link to it:

https://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/odd-harrison-qe-2-m...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on February 6, 2022 at 12:20pm

This isn’t a George Harrison signed photo. It’s a full set of Joe Long forgeries. The expression on Ringo’s face is appropriate.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by spaceman on February 6, 2022 at 12:48pm

Spot on Ballroom. Even the second kiss crosses match under both signatures. Joe Long was a talented Beatles forger and there must be more of his work still circulating  around out there.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on February 6, 2022 at 12:57pm

Thanks, spaceman. I think we’ll be seeing his work turn up for sale for a long time.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on February 6, 2022 at 2:21pm

More Joe Long...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by a pug called eva on February 6, 2022 at 10:24pm

Jim, your example really makes me wonder again about the QEII autograph...

• ▶ Reply