Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Mark Saunders on February 3, 2023 at 7:46am

Looks good to me. Wait for some other opinions, though. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mikex on February 3, 2023 at 8:02am

Looks good to me, also

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on February 3, 2023 at 10:03am

This looks real to me too.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on February 3, 2023 at 1:16pm

agreed, looks good

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Al on February 12, 2023 at 12:42pm

Someone care to chime in, would this be a circa '63 (very early sixties) when his signature was larger and the letters more spaced apart? 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by a pug called eva on February 12, 2023 at 10:35pm

More like 1970s/80s. Certainly not early 1960s.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Al on February 13, 2023 at 7:44am

Ha! thanks I'm still learning, so I got it the wrong way round 

• ▶ Reply