Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Mikex on February 27, 2023 at 6:11am

Shocking!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by marcymarc on February 27, 2023 at 6:31am

Meaning ??

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mikex on February 27, 2023 at 6:52am

Fake

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by marcymarc on February 27, 2023 at 8:49am

Roger Epperson disagrees you but thanks for your comment.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on February 27, 2023 at 7:43am

It looks like a secretarial version of his signature.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eddy on February 27, 2023 at 9:11am

I don't believe this is real either, unfortunately.  It looks rendered rather carefully.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by marcymarc on February 27, 2023 at 9:22am

Thanks for your comments. The reason I created this post was because it's in an autograph album and all of the other sigs look fine including  the Jaggers but Jones looked slightly A typical. After some research I could see that there were enough consistencies to think it's fine. Jones autographs changed a lot during his brief period of fame and we all know why, but this one looked more sensibly signed, maybe he was having a good day ! Roger agrees with me so I'm happy with that but I understand why it's getting some negative feedback even though I don't agree. 

I wasn't going to ask Roger but as soon as I got the 'shocking ' comment I couldn't resist pressing that quick opinion button !

Cheers

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eddy on February 27, 2023 at 11:00am

marcymarc - Are you able to post pics of the other Stones signatures from the album that this Jones came from?  That might be of help to the folks who have taken the time to weigh in on this thread...certainly a better sense of it's context.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by marcymarc on February 27, 2023 at 11:14am

Sure,only a Jagger the rest are other bands  none of note.

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• Screenshot_20230227_145652_eBay.jpg, 498 KB

• ▶ Reply