Authenticity is Everything
Bette Davis Signature, Fact or Fantasy? Opinions Please, Thanks!
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on
-
1930's secretarial or a forgery of one. Fancy.
-
Permalink Reply by Patrick Michael Bratcher on
-
Thanks for your opinion Eric! I do appreciate it! Patrick.
-
-
Fancy fake huh? Those dirty rascals!
-
-
Not really, you asked "fact or fancy" so I said "fancy".
-
Permalink Reply by eddy on
-
I was left a bit confused with the reply "Fancy" also.
Patrick asked: "Bette Davis Signature, Fact or Fantasy?"
-
-
Well, the important thing is the exemplars have been shown and the question answered. I tried to correct my error and still messed up! FANTASY!
-
-
Thanks for your opinion Mikex! I do appreciate it! Patrick.
-
-
I'm afraid that, in this case, these aren't just "opinions". It's an indisputable fact that this is not Bette's autograph.
-
-
p.s. I just remembered that you had a Davis signed photo that some of us commented on a few months ago. Just compare that one with this and it's readily apparent that these are two different hands signing them.
-
-
Thanks for the input Eddy. I have a bunch of Bette Davis autographs. This one doesn't look like any of the others. I bought this thing about 3 years ago. I Googled Bette Davis exemplars. I saw a couple of supposed Bette Davis signatures that were similar to this one. Also, I have learned that people's signatures do change somewhat over time. I was hoping I'd get lucky on this one. No such luck! That's why I sought your help.
Once again, I appreciate your input!
Patrick Bratcher
As an eBay Partner Network Affiliate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Get Our Newsletter
© 2026 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
