Is Your Autograph Real?
Get Opinions from Members.

Selection of McCartneys for an opinion please

Looking at adding to my collection, this selection is my pool of choice at the moment, Do all of these look good guys?

Tags: McCartney, Paul

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by JDZelenka on August 18, 2026 at 6:24am

Modern abbreviated Maccas are sometimes a difficult area to judge. But these all look dubious to me, even allowing for their rushed, abbreviated character.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by NeilG on August 18, 2026 at 6:27am

Thanks, this surprises me a bit but I absolutely get it, minefield!

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by michelle on August 18, 2026 at 8:42am

I would pass on them imo

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by NeilG on August 18, 2026 at 9:19am

All of them? 😳

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on August 19, 2026 at 3:15am

yes all of them

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by NeilG on August 19, 2026 at 3:29am

Jeez one even has a top LOA with it 😑

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve P. on August 18, 2026 at 6:45am

I have that 45rpm but alas unsigned...lol

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by fab432 on August 18, 2026 at 11:57am

Not a fan of any of these signatures. Having said that I much prefer Paul’s 1960’s - 1970’s signatures.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Raul Serrano on August 20, 2026 at 8:11am

Watch out for your supplier, my friend. It’s the same style of counterfeit you’ve been showing me all this time.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by NeilG on August 20, 2026 at 12:20pm

So puzzling, completely different dealers/people in different parts of the world too lol, one even has a Becketts LOA dude

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bruce Juice on August 20, 2026 at 1:13pm

Which one has the Beckett LOA -- and can you post the signed item AND the LOA? Also, not all of these have the same forgery style which would account from them coming from different dealers / parts of the world.