We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Any opinions on this? It is supposed to be from July/Aug 1963 and there is supposed to be some photographic evidence of the signing. Seems almost too good to be true - very clean record, same or similar pen/ink. I haven't seen the photo.

Views: 2119

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

"you must become one with the singature"......what?? lol

It is just my opinion, but they dont look  good. Maybe Roger will comment and put this to bed

That's interesting. Which ones?

I would say NO

that's cool, but i still stand by my opinion.

 carl, i hope roger will comment. Lol

i am only hear to help, i don't care what you think.

carl, you are all over the map on auto opinions, maybe you should consentrate on an area of expertise, which is not beatles auto's.

I am sorry you dont like being disagreed with, I am sorry we arent all blessed with 15 years of Beatle knowledge like yourself. You know their is such thing as being familiar with numerous autographs. 

if roger says it is no good, i won't mind being wrong. my wife and i disagree all the time and i will be married 30 yrs, in may.

ball room research the post of meanmister mustard on the lennon signed rock and roll promo photo which no one thought was real. i owened it and sent it to caiazzo, got the L.O.A then sold it on ebay for $2900.00.

This one?

bingo!

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service