Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by A.B. on January 26, 2013 at 3:29am

Looks ok to me

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bjarne Soderholm on January 26, 2013 at 5:10am

It looks very good to me. And it is missing Phil Rudd's autograph like a lot of other AC/DC signed pieces. He is a very tough signer.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Arvind Mohindra on January 29, 2013 at 6:55pm

for comparison look at the authentic signatures on Band hand signed lithograph

you signatures look close enough but i only have two authentic lithographs as refence [Back in Black - posted here] and For Those About to Rock [posting in follow up]

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• acdc1.jpg, 274 KB
• acdc2.jpg, 246 KB
• acdc3.jpg, 225 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Arvind Mohindra on January 29, 2013 at 6:57pm

for those about to rock

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• acdc1.jpg, 269 KB
• acdc2.jpg, 215 KB
• acdc3.jpg, 182 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Arvind Mohindra on January 29, 2013 at 6:57pm

proof on both lithographs on signing.

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• acdc4.jpg, 431 KB
• acdc5.jpg, 433 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Devon Laney on January 29, 2013 at 8:54pm

Absolutely genuine. Nice piece, and you can add Rudd later. He's tough, but you can get him to sign :)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by mike martin on January 30, 2013 at 11:17am

Thanks everyone, that helps me

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TW on January 31, 2013 at 7:03pm

That looks great. I picked up this EP a few months back. I had Roger Epperson check it out for me, he thought it looked good.

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• image.jpg, 73 KB

• ▶ Reply