Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Bjarne Soderholm on March 18, 2013 at 6:20am

Personally, I don't like it. I think that the Malcom, Cliff and Brian autograph is off. For example, I don't like how they have written AC/DC. Also the dot after Angus Youngs signature is missing. So my vote is No to this one.

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TW on March 18, 2013 at 8:23pm

I thought Angus looked good. He did put the dot under ac/dc. What do you think of the sketch, to me it looks like several psa authenticated ones I looked at.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Carl Ryan on March 18, 2013 at 6:26pm

I agree with Bjarne, i dont think this is genuine.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Devon Laney on March 18, 2013 at 8:56pm

I don't believe this is authentic - at all. The Brian Johnson is WAY off. The others are close, but not right either. The Angus on the pickguard is the only one that MIGHT be authentic. The rest are bad.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by mark peterson on March 19, 2013 at 12:14am

I was looking at my lp the band signed for me probably at least 10 years ago in N.Y.

Angus did do the dot below acdc....does he usually do this?

The guitar does not look right to me either.

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• acdcflick.jpg, 51 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TW on March 19, 2013 at 2:34pm

I have never noticed that Angus places a dot after his signature until Bjarne pointed it out.  Since then I have checked out several authenticated sigs and some have it some do not.  The more sigs I compare the more this Angus looks authentic to me, even the location of the dot is in the same spot as your in person sig.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bjarne Soderholm on March 19, 2013 at 6:38pm

On the autographs that I have got in person from Angus, he have done the dot in more than half of the autographs. So for me it's more often that you see the dot than you don't.

It was only one thing that I pointed out. The rest of the autographs don't look right either.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Carl Ryan on March 19, 2013 at 2:40pm

I dont think Angus always does the dot. But completely ignoring the dot and focusing on the signatures, the signatures on the guitar, including the sketch all look off.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by A.B. on March 19, 2013 at 2:43pm

Angus looks ok to me, but I don´t like the other sigs.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Devon Laney on March 19, 2013 at 5:49pm

Agreed. The Angus is the ONLY one that MIGHT be authentic. The others are all very bad forgeries. The Brian Johnson is laughable. The seller might have put a good Angus pickguard on a guitar with the forgeries of other band members. Stay away from this one.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Alastair Mulholland on March 20, 2013 at 12:26am

The signatures are bad,the only one that is close is angus.Here is my ac/dc signed lithograph to compare with.

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• _KGrHqN_o0FC1s1dqNUBQykPCh_sw_60_57.JPG, 388 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TW on April 10, 2013 at 11:32am

UPDATE:     I submitted a picture of the guitar to Roger Epperson and he got back to me this morning.  He said it is fine.  My gut feeling is that it was authentic.  I purchased it from a seller that I have gotten other items from that have all passed authentication.

• ▶ Reply