Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Charles O'Brailey on August 14, 2013 at 12:38am

fake imo

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on August 14, 2013 at 4:17am

I dont like the first one at all. the second one has a chance.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by KarlKeaton on August 14, 2013 at 4:43am

Paul's recent signatures are tough. I'm happier with the first than with the second but personally wouldn't buy either, just the way I feel a out many recent Macca autographs.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Viola on August 14, 2013 at 6:42am

Paul signed in NYC 2 weeks ago thru his car window.  Everyone got a 'Paul' only.  I was not there but heard about it and saw the graphs from folks who were there.  I like the 2nd one a lot more, but I would get the details of when and where it was signed.  1st one, forget about.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by A.B. on August 14, 2013 at 1:18pm

Opinions seem to be quite mixed at this point.

Would appreciate more Beatles experts to chime in :)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on August 14, 2013 at 3:51pm

The second one looks authentic to me. The first one is tough.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Xperttexpert on August 14, 2013 at 6:46pm

i wish i could render an opinion but i feel 'not to versed' in newer pauls.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on August 14, 2013 at 6:48pm

Join the club!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by A.B. on August 15, 2013 at 12:11am

Thanks to all of you for you input.

I will most likely ask Roger about these. If I do I´ll let you know what he says.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by A.B. on August 21, 2013 at 11:51pm

I have asked Roger about the "Kisses On The Bottom" LP...and he gave it thumbs up.

• ▶ Reply