Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on February 22, 2014 at 6:06am

I in doubts too.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on February 22, 2014 at 11:17am

This looks good to me.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on February 22, 2014 at 12:03pm

let me guess, you've seen that "g" before, Ballroom?  :)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on February 22, 2014 at 12:11pm

I don't see a problem with the "g".

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dennis Solinas on February 22, 2014 at 7:42pm

+1. I agree with ballroom. Has anyone gotten a quick opinion on the piece from psa?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on February 22, 2014 at 12:12pm

I think it looks OK...even with the letter "g"...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on February 22, 2014 at 1:50pm

in my opinion, Ringo is very easily forged. maybe this is authentic, but I think the "g' is awful and on that basis, I would not pass it.   I could not recommend that someone purchase this.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on February 22, 2014 at 2:17pm

Here's a good example showing a similar formation of the top portion of the "g":

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on February 22, 2014 at 2:46pm

I don't really see the resemblance. this signature looks perfectly fine to me. the one in the subject I still feel is questionable at best.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on February 22, 2014 at 2:55pm

I was only comparing the top portion of the "g" in each signature. I thought that was what you had a problem with. The formation looks very similar to me.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by A.B. on February 22, 2014 at 2:21pm

There are some uncharacteristic parts...but my initial gut feeling was that this is authentic.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on February 22, 2014 at 2:53pm

How about this one?...

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page