Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on May 8, 2014 at 3:32pm

Not the typical signature Im used to,not sure what that line connection is at the bottom,hard to see, almost like Stanley! So I dont like it.  Hmm just checked the link,sold for 39 bucks. This seller has other autos for cheap prices. red flag.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Peter Lougheed on May 8, 2014 at 4:12pm

It looks like it is signed "Stamley"

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Tom Schwartz on May 8, 2014 at 5:12pm

Not authentic, nor are any of the ones in this seller's completed listings.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dan Gregory on May 8, 2014 at 5:34pm

Definitely not real

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Zarelli on May 9, 2014 at 8:38am

This is a common fake style. No chance it is an authentic "late in signing" autograph.

In fact, I just got a "late in signing" autograph from a private signing. It is a compressed blob. I am very disappointed in the signature quality as it was a book already signed by Jack Kirby that I spent some cash to obtain, but I guess that is the chance you take with an elderly signer. I'll scan it in shortly and share.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Zarelli on May 9, 2014 at 4:55pm

Here you go. Stan Lee signed March 23, 2014. A less than prime example, but still light years away from the subject of this thread.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by dexter krieger on May 11, 2014 at 6:03pm

Thanks all for the input. I didn't think the todaysheroessignatures Stan Lee signature was legit, but it was good to read other opinions on it.

Mr Zipper, thanks for posting your example. I wasn't aware that Stan Lee's signature could look so rough when obtaining it late in the signing. That's good to know. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joseph Palreiro on May 11, 2014 at 11:01pm

Just thought I'd offer up another in-person example from last year.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by dexter krieger on May 12, 2014 at 3:06am

Joseph, thanks for posting your in-person example. That's a Stan Lee signature I'm more used to seeing. 

• ▶ Reply