Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Lewis Reynolds on February 13, 2015 at 6:06am

Hi,

Not sure either are real.

The macca is particularly odd with that funny loopy 'P'....and almost looks traced.

See what the experts think, when they chime in.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Luke Iovenitti on February 13, 2015 at 7:06am

Thank you, Lewis!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on February 13, 2015 at 8:03am

I'm no expert...I don't like 'em...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by N.Steiger on February 13, 2015 at 10:27am

Both fake

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by N.Steiger on February 13, 2015 at 10:29am

don't buy these little cuts. You think you are saving money by shopping for a lesser valued clipping but forgers know this so they just grab an old piece of paper and go to town and clip out the good ones.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by spaceman on February 13, 2015 at 11:33am

NO. The Lennon looks traced and Mccartney is not right. Too many of these cut type autographs coming up lately.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Luke Iovenitti on February 13, 2015 at 12:18pm

Thank you all so much! I'm glad I asked you guys before I considered purchasing them.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Edward Siebert on February 13, 2015 at 12:29pm

Neither one is rel...John never signed like that, with a fully closed 'o' and almost never with a ful 'n' in John, and the last name is all wrong. The Paul attempt has several problems with it too.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on February 13, 2015 at 1:20pm

I agree with the consensus, not authentic

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dave Stein on April 30, 2015 at 11:07pm

That was a really good catch. You are right. Lennon never signed that way from every example I've

ever studied.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Trazom1 on February 13, 2015 at 1:59pm

Both are fake. 

• ▶ Reply