We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.
This part set is from an UK auction and described as a 1967 set, signed during the Sgt. Pepper sessions.
To me, they look like an earlier period set, and the McCartney looks a bit strange (like later Post-Beatles sets). Any opinions?
Tags:
I thought these looked fine, and the story seemed all ok to.
These appear to be earlier signatures to me too.
strange set. definitely not 67. but the mccartney looks more like a 90's or later version
Here's the link to the auction.
https://www.eastbourneauction.com/catalogue/lots/79DA1536BFD64E844F...
This would be definitely a rather spectacular set, with this kind of provenance. But the set still does not look a 1967 one to me.
They are nice signatures and definetly signed in 1967.
Could someone post some '67 sets for comparison? I could search myself but maybe someone has some to hand.
They are certainly lovely bold flowing signatures. It is a shame that Ringo hasn't plonked his signature on the page opposite but I don't think his absence necessarily blows the provenance out of the water - he may have just not been there when the recipient got the idea to ask for the sigs.
I should think the photos alone must be worth £500 a piece with copyright. Obviously if all 4 were shown it would be better than 3 George and 1 Ringo.
I doubt this lot will be cheap.
Posted by CJCollector on November 11, 2024 at 6:03pm 0 Comments 1 Like
Posted by CJCollector on November 9, 2024 at 2:32pm 7 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by CJCollector on October 30, 2024 at 3:13pm 2 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin. Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service