Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on February 2, 2016 at 4:16pm

the lennon looks strange.  others look ok.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Edward Siebert on February 2, 2016 at 4:34pm

I agree. Both names of John's names are way off. But strangely the other three look really good. Maybe the three signed and Neil Aspinall's did John's...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on February 2, 2016 at 7:31pm

I agree with you guys,the Lennon looks odd.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by FB on February 2, 2016 at 9:02pm

It comes with a Caiazzo and Cox coa.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on February 2, 2016 at 9:12pm

Not as bad as this lennon.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on February 2, 2016 at 9:19pm

I think it's fine!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by KarlKeaton on February 3, 2016 at 12:39am

I agree with those that have pointed out that John signature is a bit strange, perhaps atypical is a better word.

All the other signatures look fine but there was something that bothered me about this signed picture at first. I think it's that so much seems to be atypical about it, usually when you see a signed picture it's either a Parlophone or Fan Club card that the group would carry with them, or from a magazine or perhaps one of the pictures that was commonly sold here in the UK by various companies...you get used to seeing them both signed and unsigned. Also it's signed in felt tip pen, not so common back then although I have seen other items authentically signed in felt tip.

On reading the description it turns out that it is a type of picture that was apparently sold in Australia which I guess might explain why I am unfamiliar with it, seeing that they only visited Australia once and that Ringo was only with them for the last part of that trip also make it stand out.

It certainly looks great and with COA's from Frank and Perry should do attract a good price.

• ▶ Reply