Obtained at the Sheraton Hotel in Sydney in 1964. Appears that harrison traced over his name to make it bolder. What do you guys think?

Views: 405

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I think its ok, someone else may have traced over his name.

this is real it was in an autograph book with the 3 other beatles on a seperate page the owner traced over the George as a kid the other signatures are good aswell and not traced over if on offer, the set sold for around $3000 some months ago

i just read the description Harrison didnt trace over his own name the guy did as a kid so bid accordingly the description is an outright lie  

Thanks for the information. If someone else other than Harrison traced over the signature could a 3rd party authenticator authenticate it or is it void because of what was done to it?
I remember this guy from Australia, i asked him a question and he was fairly rude on the last set.

yes it sold around 6 months ago and was on here , he was the kid who traced over it it is genuine but devalued i suppose it got passed due to it being in the same book as the others wether it would pass standing alone i dont know

Only a dill would brake up the set, even though he did trace over the George.

Roger's correct he told me he traced over the George months ago.

I doubt they'd certify it because they only say likely genuine or likely not.

who would want it?  its not a George Harrison signature anymore.  its the kid that traced over it now.

probably explains why it shows in the RR catalogue but not the results page it cant have met the secret reserve

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service