We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks. 

I just saw this photo at Bateman’s in the UK.  Paul’s signature is the only visible signature the others are very difficult to see. Look on the bodies for John and George and to the left of Ringo’s foot. As you really can’t see the others how does the Paul signature look?

Views: 378

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Paul's doesn't look real; both the P and M are not right to me. Can't see the others.

Besides Paul not looking right to me, it does not look like an original photo. It looks like a digital copy. Here's a comparison to the one you're asking about and the original Robert Whitaker photo:

Certainly looks a copy print - the loss of depth, darks and detail...

Here is another example - click for full image:

No thank you...next!!!

I saw that one, too. Paul might have been done by Neil Aspinall.  In any case, it wasn't done by Paul. Ringo looks very unusual. Lennon might be an Aspinall, and George is so light as to not make me care if it's real since the rest aren't.  It's an interesting find, but not one that I recommend you put any money toward.

I would agree with the “pass on purchase” advice!!!!

the Paul looks awful

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service