Beatles Signed Photograph

I just saw this photo at Bateman’s in the UK.  Paul’s signature is the only visible signature the others are very difficult to see. Look on the bodies for John and George and to the left of Ringo’s foot. As you really can’t see the others how does the Paul signature look?

Views: 416

Attachments: No photo uploads here

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Jim McFiver on June 28, 2018 at 8:11am
Paul's doesn't look real; both the P and M are not right to me. Can't see the others.
Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on June 28, 2018 at 8:50am

Besides Paul not looking right to me, it does not look like an original photo. It looks like a digital copy. Here's a comparison to the one you're asking about and the original Robert Whitaker photo:

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on June 28, 2018 at 8:56am

Certainly looks a copy print - the loss of depth, darks and detail...

Here is another example - click for full image:

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on June 28, 2018 at 10:08am

No thank you...next!!!

Permalink Reply by Invest_In_Graphs on June 28, 2018 at 1:29pm

I saw that one, too. Paul might have been done by Neil Aspinall.  In any case, it wasn't done by Paul. Ringo looks very unusual. Lennon might be an Aspinall, and George is so light as to not make me care if it's real since the rest aren't.  It's an interesting find, but not one that I recommend you put any money toward.

Permalink Reply by fab432 on June 28, 2018 at 1:34pm

I would agree with the “pass on purchase” advice!!!!

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on June 28, 2018 at 4:10pm

the Paul looks awful

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service