Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by ForeverMichael on March 9, 2019 at 8:17am

Hi Daniel, I do not think that KNAISZ has not checked his sources, in his staff he has more certifiers, I think it's already a guarantee in itself.
The fact that Roger Epperson states the opposite is an authoritative opinion, but against another authoritative opinion, and is called opinion because he can not be sure, this is what they taught me, otherwise they would have called it "QUICK SECURITY".
I can tell you my experience after spending at least $ 400 in quick opinion, and I assure you that there have been many times when the PSA said "LOOK AUTHENTIC" and on the other side Epperson said "NOT ORIGINAL" and vice versa, two conflicting authoritative opinions.
When I bought this autograph I was convinced, I was buying it from an important auction house and then I showed the autograph to many more or less expert people, and, to be honest, I had many positive opinions about it like those on this forum for example, and today I am convinced it is original.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on March 9, 2019 at 8:29am

I think Roger is right on this. I thought it had a good chance of being real months ago but I changed my mind a while later. There are a lot of signs that MJ didn’t sign it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Daniel Henisch on March 9, 2019 at 10:32am

Hi,

It looked ok to me aswell when i first saw it...but if Roger is not 100% sure i would rather pass on it... It's my personal opinion. Of course he can make mistakes aswell...before i want to buy an MJ autograph i like to get positive feedback by several reliable sources... Just want to be sure as possible.. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Daniel Henisch on March 9, 2019 at 10:39am

This one is on ebay right now..it is authenticated by PSA/DNA.. number is verified on their Website ... Roger thinks it is not good aswell... What is your opinion? Looks a bit off to me...

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• s-l400.jpg, 19 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by just some dude on March 9, 2019 at 12:32pm

Neither one in this thread is legit. My 2 cents.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by ForeverMichael on March 9, 2019 at 12:49pm

in fact it's just what I said

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on March 9, 2019 at 5:54pm

I don’t think it’s genuine.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by just some dude on March 9, 2019 at 12:32pm

Its not authentic. My 2 cents.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Justin Thomas on March 11, 2019 at 6:18am

not real for me, it's very close like others have said, but my gut instinct says no,even though MJ's auto can change drastically depending on date and time period, one thing in favour of this though is that the 'M' is seperate from the the base line of the rest of the sig,  something a fraudster might not take into account when signing a autograph in the style of Michael Jackson.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page