We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

STAR WARS PHOTOGRAPH AUTOS Your Opinions Please...

Just Acquired this 11x17 Original 20thCenturyFox issued StarWars Photograph and so I was wondering what the StarWars Autograph experts
on this forum think of the Autographs on it? Your opinions would be most
appreciated:)

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on July 12, 2019 at 8:53pm

You seriously can't see it? That is truly hard to understand. My digital work has been published around the world - it is obvious your photo is altered.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Taylor116 on July 10, 2019 at 2:41pm

The photo appears to be doctored, after looking at the metadata of the photo it appears as the seller once altered the image in photoshop. Here is a link to a website the shows the data of the image- http://metapicz.com/#landing?imgsrc=https%3A%2F%2Fst4.ning.com%2Fto...

Notice how the software says Adobe Photoshop CS Windows

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike T on July 10, 2019 at 3:06pm

It's not even a good photoshop lol.

Mike Bloom is wishing he struck gold here, but these forgeries are so bad, they wouldn't even fool amateur Star Wars collectors. He probably paid $100 for the piece, if it was real it would be worth thousands.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ru007 on July 10, 2019 at 3:45pm

I tried Mike T, I told him and prowse and ford look off he post a photo of ford signing it I mentioned that the placement of where the marker was didn’t match he says he didn’t sign where the marker was and ford was moving the marker to the spot that’s on his photo, to that I say nice signed photo enjoy!

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by mike bloom on July 10, 2019 at 8:54pm

Yes, your Metadata page shows that this image was altered in Photoshop and in fact I know it was as I cropped out the "un-necessary" parts of the original photo that the seller provided me in order to focus the attention on my StarWars photo. And I used Photoshop to make this crop.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on July 10, 2019 at 9:23pm

Why does the poster appear to have have a digital grain not seen in any other portion of this "proof photo"?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by mike bloom on July 12, 2019 at 7:23pm

Well, here's a thought about the "grain" issue.
What if my photo is actually "grainier" then the
other photos in the proofimg. Could this be
the reason?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on July 12, 2019 at 8:56pm

"Selective grain"? Come on...it only is seen on the poster...

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Woody2Shoes on July 11, 2019 at 8:16pm

Mike, the grouping of signatures. Were these signatures added to the piece one by one, different events, different signings; in groups, 2 or 3 or more here and there at one event, or were all added to the piece at the same time, same event, or in close time or event proximity? If you know.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike T on July 11, 2019 at 8:43pm

They were added at the same time, by a forger.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by mike bloom on July 12, 2019 at 7:34pm

I know you love the word "forgery", cause its such an easy word to spit-out. Now if you can actually tell me WHY you believe a specific signature is a forgery, I might be inclined to take you more seriously. But your blanket "forgery" statement tells me and the other viewers nothing whatsover.
So, lets pick apart each signature and lets start with Harrison Ford. What EXACTLY is it about the Harrison Signature that convinces you it's a forgery? Meaning, is it a specific letter,
is it a specific slant (or lack thereof)? What?