Ronald Reagan signed "historic print" : a true transformation.

This is interesting......

The first ad below for the signed book appeared in late April (couple of months ago)

The second ad for the "historic 'Tear Down This Wall' souvenir print" (different seller) appeared today (June 3)

Views: 565

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by eddy on June 3, 2025 at 4:03pm

Meanwhile, PSA again with no image on their verification page.  We've seen this bit before.  Done for other creations.  No visual evidence of what was verified.  It is at least described as a "cut" which is what it is.  

Permalink Reply by JK on June 3, 2025 at 4:25pm

It's magic! 

🤮

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on June 3, 2025 at 5:10pm

Dark magic.

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on June 3, 2025 at 5:13pm

If this was printed on the page taken from the book I would not call it a cut. One surface size is given. It says the photo print is hand signed. That Lugosi should have been "Cut/Pastiche" and this and that Trump mag, if what they appear to be, should be "Blank sheet/Overprint." 

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on June 3, 2025 at 5:38pm

It was a cut, just like it was a signed book. Now...

Permalink Reply by eddy on June 3, 2025 at 5:55pm

I find the description of this "Tear Down This Wall" creation to be very brazen.  Nowhere is there any indication that this item has been altered and the wording of it leads you to believe that Reagan intentionally signed what you now see encapsulated.  The term "historic" to describe it certainly emphasizes that.

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on June 3, 2025 at 5:58pm

It's like the other thing, clear misrepresentation. The presentation is a lie.

Permalink Reply by Scott Paul on June 4, 2025 at 8:27am

In my mind if I saw that I would think Reagan signed the photograph.  It reminds me of one of those razor cut cards that destroyed a signed document of Don Knotts to create a stupid "card."  I would have paid far more for the genuine and very rare document.  

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on June 4, 2025 at 8:43am

All you have to go by is the non-photographic book paper it sits on and the manufacture method (very odd), the unusual size. This will fool people. There needs to be a few more descriptive terms to avoid this slipperiness."Photograph", "Blank Sheet" and "Cut" are not sufficient to avoid misrepresentation of any sort.

Permalink Reply by eddy on June 4, 2025 at 8:48am

If you reread the current ad, there's seemingly not much doubt that it's meant to represent this as something it never was.  

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on June 3, 2025 at 5:56pm

Photo print" and not "Photograph" which speaks to the paper and method of manufacture. I hope it fades.

Permalink Reply by JMS1223 on June 3, 2025 at 6:08pm

I saw this exact same thing done to a Martin Luther King Jr. signed book. They cut the signed page and overprinted his famous “I Have A Dream” speech photo over it. Needless to say they are asking 3x what they originally paid for the signed book. 😣 

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service