We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.
Authenticity is Everything
Help with Twist & Shout EP
Any opinions on this? It is supposed to be from July/Aug 1963 and there is supposed to be some photographic evidence of the signing. Seems almost too good to be true - very clean record, same or similar pen/ink. I haven't seen the photo.
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Xperttexpert on
-
every day i come across beatles auto's i have never seen before signed in a customary way and it is not hard to say it is real or not.
-
Permalink Reply by Beatleworld on
-
You are quite right, it's only my opinion but I would bet my last dollar on the fact that the signature is fine.....I think we are going round in circles, I'm sure we both don't have time for that, the George is authentic and that's all that matters, if you haven't seen any similar then you'll need to do some more research (as I wrote earlier, a simple search on google will show) as there's hundreds of similar ones out there, the only concern should be its authenticity, nothing more and if you're still not satisfied then send it to Frank and he'll confirm it, we'll just have to agree to disagree, until next time, take care.
-
Permalink Reply by Carl Ryan on
-
If you say its authentic than odds are it probably is, but i have to go with Ballroom on this one as far as still being skeptical. The John doesnt look right to me nor does the George. In this case i suppose its best to agree to disagree. I myself would not feel comfortable spending the money it apparently sold for. It may be an absolute typical Beatles sig, but it doesnt look like what i would be comfortable with purchasing.
-
Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on
-
Paul and Ringo are stone perfect, and Ringo is really tough to forge. The pen is the same for all four...and it's not a ballpoint. Once Frank has power again and things are back to normal there I'll ask him if he has exemplars similar to the Lennon and Harrison. Remind me if I forget.
-
-
Steve what are your thoughts on the Lennon. That one has bothered me the most from the start, and i read earlier where you had some concern with it too. Did you feel more secure on it now?
-
-
Carl, the Lennon bothered me the most, too, but I just think it was less flowingly signed because of the pen. Like I think Harrison was. These were all signed with the same pen.
-
-
why not just ask him if it is authentic? thats all that matters. he is a beatles hand writing expert. not just their sigs.
-
-
The reason i didnt ask is because he already answered that earlier in the post when he stated he wasnt sure. Thus im asking about a specific signature. =
-
-
my bad, i was asking steve about caiazzo.
-
-
Because exemplars will provide tangible evidence. We can ask Roger for an authenticity opinion and if he's not completely confident he'll tell us. I usually don't ask Frank authenticity opinions for publication.
-
-
all of a sudden i am not receiving emails on this dicission?
-
-
Right above "Replies to this Discussion" you should see text that you can select to follow it. You may have inadvertently clicked the "Stop Following" link in your email. Happens to me sometimes, too.
Blog Posts
Ebay Seller Smpsportscards Sells Forged Counterfeit Willie Mays 1996-97 Topps Autograph Card
Posted by CJCollector on November 11, 2024 at 6:03pm 0 Comments 1 Like
COA CSA Authentic Forged Babe Ruth Cut Autograph Laughable
Posted by CJCollector on November 9, 2024 at 2:32pm 7 Comments 0 Likes
Ebay Seller Tsuch67 Sells Forged Mickey Mantle Duke Snider Willie Mays Baseball
Posted by CJCollector on October 30, 2024 at 3:13pm 2 Comments 0 Likes
Photos
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
