We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.

Jimi Hendrix Signed Picture PSA/DNA ???

I am not sure whether this Jimi Hendrix signed picture had been posted or discussed. It was discussed on RACC forum.

What do you think ????

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Paul on July 9, 2015 at 9:36pm

It sounds too fishy for me. So there being deceptive.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mark Roberts on July 10, 2015 at 8:28am

I agree! Bruce Juice..

Mark

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve on July 10, 2015 at 8:01pm

Exactly, I've been saying the same thing for years.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on July 10, 2015 at 5:22am

That's exactly wha t s going on Bruce.all these pieces get whored out to iconic,then ebay then rr then ebay then iconic then rr.it's a revolving door .they are just going to keep plugging away until someone meets there reserve.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Full Time Flipper on July 10, 2015 at 9:02am

Hopefully they will run out of buying money at some point and let a real collector have a decent chance of winning something at a realistic price

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Full Time Flipper on July 10, 2015 at 9:11am

tracks uk also have a cosy relationship with RR they buy up stuff in the Uk and stick it on RR 2 or 3 times until it eventually sells for the right price ..that zeppelin john bonham publicity photo being one of them it was on RR twice after being bought by tracks in the Uk for around £700 , it appeared to have sold for around $1300 or so first time at RR and then went back on and eventually sold for a higher price that suited tracks and RR so there has to be in house bidding going on at a lot of these so called high end auctions

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by michelle on July 10, 2015 at 9:25am

And the mark up prices Tracks put on their stuff for sale is awful

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by michelle on July 10, 2015 at 9:27am

it took me a while to realize that this went on , but how many collectors, of which I am a only a small purchaser, realizes that this cozy link exists?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bruce Juice on July 10, 2015 at 1:20pm

I don't mind when auction houses have reserves (as sometimes sellers don't want to lose money on an item). But when an item doesn't meet that reserve, they should say that. (Instead of making us believe that the item sold and then keep relisting it).

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Gratefulphish on July 11, 2015 at 12:18am

It's worse than that when auction houses shill bid their own items, and drive up a bidder who is unknowingly bidding against the house. It's just a question of whether they will go as high as the house wants, otherwise the house wins. They lose nothing and try again later with the same item.