We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.

More questions about Presspasscollectibles. Are these Mick Jagger autographs real?

The seemingly cozy relationship between Presspasscollectibles and PSA/DNA concerns me. Presspass seems to have quite a supply of Mick Jagger autographs, most of which are authenticated by PSA/DNA.

Now I know they do sell a lot of legitimate stuff. However, do they ever try to mix in some non-authentic items that they are confident that PSA will pass for them?

Check out these two Presspass, PSA/DNA authenticated Mick Jagger autographs. The first I believe is legit, while the second, I think not. But they have several more Mick's that PSA has okayed for them as well. Where do they get so many Mick's?

0 members like this

Attachments: No photo uploads here

image.jpg, 290 KB
image.jpg, 233 KB

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by James on May 4, 2015 at 2:27pm

I agree. Mike. I've seen these supposed millimeter individual strands of JFK's hair anywhere from $100 to $900. I mean seriously how could that be verified?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike T on May 4, 2015 at 2:31pm

I usually don't say anything to bring people's collections down, but anyone who collects hair from supposed famous people really needs to re-evaluate their hobby.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by nicholas pansini on June 11, 2016 at 9:23am

I agree with the first, the second I have no idea. I have had three or four dealings with PPC and I feel I got lucky with mine - 100% genuine pieces. Just when I thought I found a trustworthy entity to purchase good graphs from, I hear crap like this.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve on June 11, 2016 at 9:51am

I have known this guy since he was 13 years old and would not buy anything from him even if it has a PSA sticker on it.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on June 11, 2016 at 12:41pm

Why Steve?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve on June 11, 2016 at 7:24pm

Paul, I wish I had the time to list everything I know about this guy. If you are able to go through some older threads, I have gone into great detail.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on June 11, 2016 at 7:30pm

Do you think he pays psa to overlook items. Slab them up so too speak.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on June 11, 2016 at 7:58pm

I think that's a fair question, Paul. Because something's not quite right with some of this crap. You know...before the 1960s, it's been noted that most Americans believed everything their government told them. Then we learned more about JFK's assassination, The Gulf of Tonkin incident (which never happened), Watergate, and now the revelations by Edward Snowden. If our governments can lie to us, why not PSA?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on June 11, 2016 at 8:06pm

I dont know about the American gov too much. But money can make people do wicked things especially if it's a company as a whole,then their could be a few bad seeds in that company. There's just far too many forgeries that their authenticating.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on June 11, 2016 at 8:07pm

I never expect a business to put me ahead of their interests. It is a business. In the case of a surgeon, one hopes ;)

Eric

Edit add: I just realized, I seriously avoid (it just doesn't some up with what/where I am looking) anything with COA/LOA or those darn stickers etc. Were it a painting or guitar or whatever, no one would accept what is essentially advertising on items in their collection, but many do it seems. Some prefer it - I am not among them. I am picky it seems, I don't want cheap copies but lab photos from orig negs (signed if possible), Official products, promo stuff...something with a 'wiped" inscription? There is no signature I can imagine that I would accept with that sort of (to me) damage/alteration).

Eric

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Samuel John Clifford on June 11, 2016 at 12:22pm

Presspass has some Uma Thurman's for sale now I like some of them while all of the "Index Card" ones are forgeries in my opinion. The first three are Authentic while the next four are not.