Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on June 1, 2016 at 11:07am

Hi Nicholas,

I dunno, 40 years old? That E (?), three breaks in Clapton? That "a"? The slant of "ric" - number of strokes? What do others make of this? There is an exact duplicate on eBay - is this a preprint? That is?

Eric

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on June 1, 2016 at 11:44am

Nicholas,

What does the ink do on yours? Does is dissolve into the image in the glare of a light? Change color? Logic dictates these are copies/reprints/preprints, or just forgeries of forgeries.

Eric

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by A.B. on June 1, 2016 at 11:19am

Looks funky to me...and certainly not 40 years old imo

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by nicholas pansini on June 1, 2016 at 12:26pm

Thanks AB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Tim Male on June 1, 2016 at 11:51am

Wouldn't go anywhere near this. I've seen great vintage sigs by Clapton but they don't look a great deal like this.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by nicholas pansini on June 1, 2016 at 12:25pm

Seller insists it's genuine.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by nicholas pansini on June 1, 2016 at 12:26pm

Thank you all for commenting here!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Tim Male on June 1, 2016 at 12:56pm

Naturally seller would say that. It really is off. If you're thinking of buying it get a quick opinion from Roger Epperson mate

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by nicholas pansini on June 1, 2016 at 1:09pm

Ok Tim, I thank you!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Adam Halloran on June 1, 2016 at 1:11pm

I agree, this does not look authentic to me.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by nicholas pansini on June 1, 2016 at 3:08pm

Thank you Adam

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on June 1, 2016 at 2:55pm

Not real.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next ›
• Page