We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

As a collector of autographs, rock memorabilia, I feel that I need to allow for a percentage of forgeries that I may have purchased over my time of collecting. Well I hope to keep the percentage small, but I think it's almost impossible to have a 100 percent success rate ,not being an expert that is. Even these days people are disagreeing with tpa.

 Well that seems to be the reality for me , how about you and your collection?

Views: 7849

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I agree with Chris Williams' opinion on GFA. If what he said isn't true, why didn't you post a real Mantle signed ball with their COA instead of posting one certified by PSA and JSA and saying it was GFA certified?

That would be because he can't decide which of the 40 GFA certed Mantles to post.

Ugh!

which goes back to my original point, before I decided to amuse myself by feeding the troll... what is this cat's end game? he can't possibly be trying to improve GFA's rep with his behavior, and this stuff is saved for posterity... is he just a forger who's angry at us for outing his illegal (and let's be honest, poorly executed) activities?

If what Chris said about GFA isn't true they'd be trying to sue everyone as bad as they've been bashed. Steve Rocchi is a John House AtAuction exclusive. Once EBAY bans them AtAuction will toss that crook aside and find another one to blindly stamp approval on all that forgery junk they have stacked up.

Instead of trying to get personal, why don't you demonstrate your knowledge of autographs and prove me wrong.

What is so difficult about that?

People like you come on here and instantly begin to attack myself and others, instead of sticking to the point (autographs).

p(rick) you are totally clueless but low educated morons like you are sheep

I'm with Cyrkin. 

How long must we endure?
Popcorn anyone?

This is beyond amusing now.

This is such a fun thread! What I'm trying to figure out is what this guy's end game is... is he part of the forgery ring who uses GFA to get his fakes rubber stamped? an innocent dupe who bought something GFA'ed, and can't admit to himself he got took? or even an innocent who didn't know GFA is known as an unacceptable/unreliable authenticator who sent his own items in, only to find his investments devalued because of it? something else? Just curious what kind of person behaves like this, even anonymously on an internet forum. Boggles the mind really.

Jason stfu you moron.....really where do you get your information that gfa is unacceptable/unreliable tell me wheres your proof except on this site which reminds me of fox news.....prove to me they have ever been sued found guilty of  fakes with facts.....investment devalued lol you fool......you ignorance tops all 

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service