PLEASE ASK QUESTIONS IN THE DISCUSSION FORUMS, NOT BLOGS.
READ THIS BEFORE YOU POST, THANKS.

Hello again everyone, I do hope everyone is safe and well.

If you have time to offer an opinion on the attached photo, it would be appreciated.

Please let me know if pic can be opened.

Thank you

Tags: Auction, Beatles, Galleries, Hudson

Views: 1126

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Looks strange to me.

I agree with Eric. This isn’t authentic IMO.

Agree with the consensus,  not authentic IMO. 

It looks strange, but there are some typical features and vibes, very difficult to judge whether it is authentic or not.

I suspect these could be genuine, perhaps signed shortly after Ringo joined (August) or sometime in the Fall, 1962. The band clearly hadn't signed much (but would be deluged within a year).  More research is needed -  but I'd give them a tentative yes.

I know the autograph because I saw it myself (I think 2016 or 2017) on Greig McArthur's homepage. If autographsale.net is trustworthy, then the autograph is authentic. The shapes of the signatures looks good. Looks like late 62's or early 63's IMO.

I would be surprised if these were deemed authentic

No thanks...

Here is a genuine  set signed in early 63. This convinces me more that one in the OP is not authentic.

Great find, Spaceman. It looks like this one was used as an example to forge the set in the OP.


Fake

They have been copied from a legit set

It just never ends - fakes, copies forgeries and more ...  Seems it might be best to find the set that really works for you and keep it forever. That way you won’t have to play in the minefield!!!

RSS

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2021   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service