Authenticity is Everything
Fleetwood Mac - any good ????????????????
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Steve
-
Makes me sad that someone would fight so hard to convince everyone they are a crook!
-
Permalink Reply by John Freeman
-
What is sad, is how you have all completely ignored everything I explained, and have since decided to gang up on me like schoolyard bullies, with your name calling and finger pointing. All of the images being posted are of 100% authentic items, which not one of you can point out a single issue with. But you will make things up anyway, because you are biased and refuse to be proven wrong. Even the Phil Collins handwritten lyrics I have listed with a letter from Phil Collins himself, you would probably try to say is fake. So, it really doesn't matter what I say or do here, your minds seem to be made up.
-
Permalink Reply by Josh Board NEW & Improved
-
Here's something I've always wondered about. I LOVE when we all chime in, and expose the BS folks and their lame stories. BUT please people, there's one thing you need to stop doing. Stop telling them WHY we could tell a signature is fake. Don't say the loop is wrong, or goes this way, or you can see where the pen stopped and started, or whatever else. Don't educate the forgers, on how to ply their trade more convincingly. Just say "I won't go into the weeds on to why I feel it's fake, but I have many reasons." And leave it at that. When enough of us chime in as to thinking it's bogus, that's enough to scare the buyer off, or let him get a "quick opinion" from someone like Roger Epperson, or whatever avenue they want to take. I even feel bad going against my own rule when I say "All done in the same hand" because I don't want a forger to then have a friend do one of the squiggle signatures, or they purposely try to sign different, so it doesn't look similar to the other signatures they forged.
-
Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67
-
I totally understand that Josh, and do it very sparingly. I don’t think it’s giving much away to basically say that Ringo forms his “R”s in a way that probably pretty much everyone else does. It also shows a specific example of what is going on across multiple signatures. It’s hard not to point out a silly mistake that probably wouldn’t have been repeated when someone who’s selling forgeries comes in with that kind of an attitude.
-
-
Ok, let me get this straight. I have more than 300 listings containing more than 1500 total signatures. And you are saying that all of the signatures have been forged? Ok, besides the Fleetwood Mac program, which I have pointed out the reason the signatures seem "forced". Tell us, or show us, any of the other signatures you believe have been forged, and explain why. Out of more than 1500 signatures, surely you can show ONE, and explain why it is forged. I will be waiting for your example.
-
Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo
-
Worst Orson Welles I ever saw:
-
-
What issue do you have with these?
- Attachments: No photo uploads here
-
-
IMG_9385.jpg, 863 KB -
IMG_9387.jpg, 580 KB
-
IMG_9386.jpg, 1 MB
-
-
Permalink Reply by michelle
-
well. Not one of the sigs featured there look anything like a genuine sig, pre dec 1982-3 which is the very latest these could have been signed if genuine. The flow, the slant, the letter formations are really bad. . Markers were quite rare pre 1982-3 anyway
-
-
Worse than this one?
-
-
That's Russell's 1978 signed document at HD. But what has that o do with your items? Why not explain the "problematic" "Bowie." "Sinatra," "Waters," "McCartney," "ABBA "etc, mentioned and shown in this thread? That should prove more interesting. Why is that your Bowie so very atypical to say the least, and only $373.50 Buy it Now? The sold 1995 Outside is a joke. There is at least one entire letter in the "Sinatra" that doesn't belong there - why is that?
© 2025 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
