We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.

are these two Paul McCartney autographs real?

Hello friends at live.autographmagazine.com,

Now I am new in your community but I know this site for a long time as a watcher.

Great to be here. I am an autograph fan/collector from Germany, especially for Beatles, Jazz and writers.

My proud is a in person signed White Album by Paul McCartney.

Recently I bought 2 Paul McCartney autographs from a very respectable dealer on eBay called Parlogram. He is from Austria.

In May he sells an early George Harrison autograph, which was here discussed for "real".

What is your opinion about the two PMC's?.

Thank you very much for contact.

Regards from Germany.

Uwe

Tags: Beatles, McCartney, Paul, autograph, real, signed

0 members like this

Attachments: No photo uploads here

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Uwe Boehme on June 8, 2015 at 4:06pm

Hello Michelle, terrier 8HOF and Dan Gregory.

Very glad to your opinions. I am happy that all of you say that the signed album is fine. Great. Will see if other members tell me more about the envelope. Here we have different opinions.

Regards to the world: United States, UK and New Zealand.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dan Gregory on June 8, 2015 at 2:44pm

The album is good. I agree with Ballroom the envelope looks strange but could be good but just looks a little strange

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Uwe Boehme on June 8, 2015 at 4:05pm

Hello Dan Gregory, terrier8HOF and Michelle.

Very glad to your opinions. I am happy that all of you say that the signed album is fine. Great. Will see if other members tell me more about the envelope. Here we have different opinions.

Regards to the world: United States, UK and New Zealand.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on June 8, 2015 at 3:28pm

I agree with Ballroom. the Album looks fine, the envelope looks off.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Uwe Boehme on June 8, 2015 at 4:05pm

Hello terrier 8HOF, Dan Gregory and Michelle.

Very glad to your opinions. I am happy that all of you say that the signed album is fine. Great. Will see if other members tell me more about the envelope. Here we have different opinions.

Regards to the world: United States, UK and New Zealand.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on June 8, 2015 at 4:43pm

Welcome, I might as well opine as well. The album seems problem free. While not that experienced with McCartney seventies signatures, I think the envelope is suspicious also. It looks like there maybe a couple starts and stops ( dark spots at ends of letters) and it seems to bog down after A in Paul.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Uwe Boehme on June 10, 2015 at 3:27am

I thank you Ian for your opinion. With the signed record I have def. no doubt too.

And the signed envelope for me is real too.I have an in person and for my eyes signed white album, and on this he wrotes the "u" after the "a" in the same way with bog down as on the envelope. The "P" and the "CC" is always a little bit different, it depends on the signing situation I think (sitting on a table, standing, hurry or not hurry etc.) I compared the "thanks" and "love" with other writings of him from that time (greetings, lyrics etc.). I think it matches his writing very good. And the biro has in my mind the usual light signs of age of ca. 40 years. The envelope was over the years very carefully stored. Will see, if somebody new will give his comment next.

Thanks again for your opinion.

Regards from Germany from U

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Edward Siebert on June 9, 2015 at 12:09am

I think both are good. The writing/inscriptions on both match his writing. The signature on the album is also solid. The signature on the envelope isn't great, as there are some parts that aren't 'perfect' or standard, like the P and the u and the cC, but overall it's pretty good and matches his style, I think.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Uwe Boehme on June 10, 2015 at 3:00am

Edward, I thank you for your opinion. With the signed record I have def. no doubt too.

And the signed envelope for me is real too.I have an in person and for my eyes signed white album, and on this he writes the "u" almost in the same way as on the envelope. The "P" and the "CC" is always a little bit different, it depends on the signing situation I think (on the table, Standing, hurry or not hurry. etc. I agree with you, in general on the envelope it is his writing and matches a signature from the mid-seventees.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on June 10, 2015 at 8:56am

I like the album...

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Uwe Boehme on June 12, 2015 at 1:10pm

thank you Jim for your appreciated opinion, all of you are sure with the album, automan and others says, both are genuine-that makes me happy. I compared the envelope before buying time and time, I think in the seventies he signes a little bit different from time to time, but in general I think too that the envelope is ok.