We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Bad Hendrix

Aside from the Hendrix autograph that I previously posted, there were two other rather dubious signed Hendrix items in the auction. One was a plain signed cut, and the other a signed picture.

Everything about the cut, the slant, the lettering, the formation, etc., looked "bad." Unless he was writing on something at an odd angle, it just doesn't match his usual writing style. In any case, I steered clear of it.

The photo was even worse, but it was hard to tell unless you were able to really enlarge it clearly on a computer monitor. The cut sold, but the photo did not even draw a bid.

0 members like this

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Hendrix Pink.jpg, 11 KB
Hendrix Photo.jpg, 752 KB

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on November 18, 2016 at 12:35pm

+1. I believe it was signed in March or April of '67.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Gratefulphish on November 21, 2016 at 6:40pm

+1 as well. It is a nice partial set.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on November 18, 2016 at 12:43pm

I'm not anywhere near as good as Ballroom on Hendrix, but I really like this!

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by a pug called eva on November 18, 2016 at 11:21pm

Steve, if you are talking about the Stu example I agree. It would be a masterpiece of the forger's art if it wasn't right. A forger would no doubt make it a threesome anyway.