We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.
Tags:
I THINK that it MIGHT good. Late Feb-early March 1963?
All fakes. Each one is a terrible amateurish scribble. Thumbs down.
I also think these might be good. The John and Paul definitely look consistent with early examples I've seen. George and, particularly Ringo, are pretty rough but still might be okay. I think Ringo's first name looks okay but "Starr" is a real mess. This could be due to rushing or the signing surface - this is only a newspaper clipping so likely wasn't signed with the upmost care.
Did they sign this on a solid backing?...or did they use their hands to hold the photo?
I saw these a couple of days ago, on the auctioneers website, I think they look good, early 63.
I think they're real, too.
I’ve seen this one before and also think they’re likely authentic.
While still skeptical, I see the rational of your reasoning. It was the George that threw me, then Paul's truncated scrawl.
It's always good to be cautious.
Steve, usually I am and if so, I withhold judgement. It's rare that I let something sneak by - but this appears to be one.
Jim, I didn’t mean to be cautious before you say how you feel. I meant that it’s always good to be cautious before you decide a piece is real.
That's what I originally meant, whether those signatures were real.
I suppose both statements have validity, however, and are worthy of reflection.
Posted by CJCollector on November 11, 2024 at 6:03pm 0 Comments 1 Like
Posted by CJCollector on November 9, 2024 at 2:32pm 7 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by CJCollector on October 30, 2024 at 3:13pm 2 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin. Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service