We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Currently on auction at Fieldings in the UK is this signed newspaper clipping. Too many things wrong with these IMO. Any other opinions?

Views: 448

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I THINK that it MIGHT good. Late Feb-early March 1963?

All fakes. Each one is a terrible amateurish scribble. Thumbs down.

I also think these might be good. The John and Paul definitely look consistent with early examples I've seen. George and, particularly Ringo, are pretty rough but still might be okay. I think Ringo's first name looks okay but "Starr" is a real mess. This could be due to rushing or the signing surface - this is only a newspaper clipping so likely wasn't signed with the upmost care. 

Did they sign this on a solid backing?...or did they use their hands to hold the photo?

I saw these a couple of days ago, on the auctioneers website, I think they look good, early 63. 

I think they're real, too.

I’ve seen this one before and also think they’re likely authentic.

While still skeptical, I see the rational of your reasoning. It was the George that threw me, then Paul's truncated scrawl.

It's always good to be cautious.

Steve, usually I am and if so, I withhold judgement. It's rare that I let something sneak by - but this appears to be one.

Jim, I didn’t mean to be cautious before you say how you feel. I meant that it’s always good to be cautious before you decide a piece is real. 

That's what I originally meant, whether those signatures were real.

I suppose both statements have validity, however, and are worthy of reflection.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service