Hi:
At Steve Cyrkin's invitation, I'd like to call your attention to a signature study I've posted on my blog, Charlton Heston signature study by Steve Zarelli.
I believe I have identified the "tell" in Charlton Heston secretarial signatures, and if I am correct, the news is not good for most collectors. It appears that most Heston signed photos are secretarially signed.
Here is a synopsis:
The Theory
Photographs and other memorabilia sent to Mr. Heston's office were signed by a secretary. However, Mr. Heston did authentically sign books through-the-mail.
Real vs. Secretary
In authentic signatures, the R in "Charlton" is distinctly a lowercase "r" and less than half the height of the L. The first four letters are clearly "Char."
In secretarial signatures, the R looks much more like a lowercase "l" and is about the same height as the L. So, the first four letters appear to be "Chall."
I have attached two images to give you a small sampling.
For more details and images, please visit my blog at the link below.
I'd love to hear your feedback and thoughts on this. I fully anticipate some resistance to the theory, because denial is always the first step. In fact, I would love to be proved wrong, because that would mean I wasn't sitting on a bunch of secretary signed photos!
By way of introduction, I have been collecting since the early 90s and I am the UACC Ethics Director.
I look forward to the discussion.
Regards,
Steve Zarelli
Tags: Charlton, Forgery, Heston, Secretary, authenticating, autograph, secretarial
i had contact with jones and he asked me to send them back.
for a refund.
so thanks for the advice
by the way i have posted photo,s in my albums, take a look !
nice ones.
Came across this UACC registered dealer seems all her Hestons are secretarial
I will contact this dealer. Thanks for bringing it to our attention.
Cyndi Thomson has removed the secretarial Hestons and thanked us for the heads-up.
A big thumbs up, Cyndi.
Since PSA/DNA and JSA don't decommission autographs, what if we maintained a database of ones where there's no reasonable doubt they are not authentic?
Not just Hestons, but anything where they clearly made a mistake?
Yes
actually, I believe they have and continue to do so but it is a long and arduous process.. didn't know about the quick opinion limitation... when did that go into effect?
I'm not familiar with anyone having to use a TPA on all their listings if two pieces fail quick opinion over time. I don't believe that's the case, but maybe it is. But I have heard of eBay having someone's inventory checked out, after they get a number of listings of forgeries reported to them, and then telling that seller they need to use one of their approved authenticators.
Mike,
I wouldn't expect eBay to pull a listing based on our determination that something certed is definitely not good. It would be a list that collectors could check.
picked this one up from my pal "vanderhoven" in his unfallable way of thowing a "vanderGrenade" (a new term for you grant) on a UACC RD 304 & an Aftal dealer 075 selling some non-authentic hestons; The grenade portion in typical fashion is where it goes off track but the good news is he is a convert even if he can't openly speak of the "secret tells" he used to idenfity Heston. There is still hope for "the vanderhoven"!
http://www.rutlandautographs.co.uk/advanced_search_result.php?keywo...
a few have come down since but of the remaining 4 it would appear only one on a 3x5 index card appears authentic; with the other 3 remaining ones along these lines.
Posted by CJCollector on February 2, 2025 at 12:57pm 0 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by CJCollector on February 1, 2025 at 4:30am 0 Comments 1 Like
Posted by CJCollector on January 31, 2025 at 4:47pm 0 Comments 0 Likes
© 2025 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.