Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Xwiesy on December 5, 2015 at 1:49pm

No from me.

Permalink Reply by Syreena Sexxton on December 9, 2015 at 6:58pm

Thanks for weighing in but is your response to BOTH pic #1 and #2, or one in particular?

Permalink Reply by James on December 5, 2015 at 2:46pm

The first two that you have pictured are authentic, but the last one is not. But just be careful that they are not high-tech copies.

Permalink Reply by Syreena Sexxton on December 9, 2015 at 7:45pm

Thanks James. I purchased the first (black sharpie). The "M" formation looks similar to early 80's examples I've researched. I am not the owner of Pic #2, but I've included here as an example of a style I'm more accustomed to seeing. I find this one slightly more pleasing to the eye, but for the life of me I can never identify the first letter as an "M" no matter how many examples I look at (lol). And where's the "a"?

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on December 9, 2015 at 8:03pm

Hello,

Is it an unusual "M" or a missing "a" in the second example? Other examples show the fourth loop does not serve as the "a", so where is it? Agree w James - be careful here.

There are two threads about the same pics? Maybe delete the other? I responded to the other some time ago with my "a" concern, and then saw this thread and thought I'd lost in completely.

The essential structure of the "M" is the same in both FWIW. Sort of like 2/3 of a Garland 1950's "M".

Eric

PS - What did you think of my Bowie?