Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on September 23, 2017 at 4:28pm

Odd.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rich on September 23, 2017 at 4:39pm

I'd toss both those certs and get opinions from knowledgable Beatles/McCartney experts.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on September 23, 2017 at 4:43pm

I think that's a wise choice with this one.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on September 23, 2017 at 6:35pm

It's a style I've seen before that I don't trust.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on September 23, 2017 at 8:38pm

That's how I see it too.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on September 23, 2017 at 10:03pm

A bit of a concern, for sure.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Invest_In_Graphs on September 23, 2017 at 11:45pm

Echoing the thoughts of others, and perhaps going a bit further, "Nope!"

I'm surprised that PSA did a letter. Since Joe Orlando signed it, I wonder whom reviewed McCartney. I don't believe Joe reviews autographs, but I could be wrong.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by thomas connolly on September 24, 2017 at 1:12pm

december 11 th 1989, he took everyones items up into his room at the plaza athena new york hotel., his confidante richard brought them up, he signed at least 30 or more, all full paul mccartneys, and linda signed some also. after this, in the 90s, his signature wasnt full anymore, and as time went on, it got worse. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on September 24, 2017 at 6:37pm

So you essentially suggesting this was done by proxy? Like A Mama Jean Harlow?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on September 24, 2017 at 3:56pm

I've seen worse

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on September 24, 2017 at 3:59pm

So you think it's authentic?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by thomas connolly on September 24, 2017 at 5:23pm

im not an expert on him, but i would pass on it. a very strange p i never seen before. 

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page