Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by David Lewis on April 9, 2021 at 5:05pm

A pug called eva, in my humble opinion both Taylors you posted are not hers. The "1949" autograph isn't right, and your second photo does not have the right characteristics. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by a pug called eva on April 10, 2021 at 1:45am

I can see where you are coming from on the 1949 signature, David. I'll try to do some more digging on that one and the other, which is stamped 1958.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by WHuffman on April 9, 2021 at 7:10pm

The autographed photos you've posted look like the stuff from Florida.

Vintage wire photos signed in fountain pen, typically personalized to foreign press, such as; "Cinelandia", "Filmlandia", etc.  I was sucked in and bought quite a few items - as they started to fail PSA, and Beckett, I successfully returned all the stuff without problems. I still watch their listings and have noticed certain characteristics within all the autographs that confirmed my beliefs.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by a pug called eva on April 10, 2021 at 1:46am

Do you believe that the "Florida photos" are secretarials or forgeries and do you believe that any of the Florida photos are good?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eddy on April 10, 2021 at 8:46am

I'm on the side that they are blatant forgeries. Having seen these photos popping up quite a bit over the years, I do have to say that it has stuck in my mind that the forger of these has had uncanny ability to make the signatures look old. No wonder folks have been duped by them.

• ▶ Reply