Hi. This is not authentic in my opinion. Sorry.
The photo is inkjet printed. Inkjet printers that aren't for commercial users like printing companies came out in Sept. 1995, and were nowhere near this quality and degraded quickly until 2000 or so.
A 90s signature would be on a regular continuous tone photo, the kind you get from Costco.
Thanks Steve the coa is dated 2004 but I assumed it might be an earlier signature just by the style,its looking doubtful that it is authentic though now
I agree with you.
not a fan of it . If steve says the printing is wrong I go with him other wise erics graph is all over rthe place so know ur source when buying
ps he really hasn't signed in years