I wasn’t sure it was good when I saw the other photo, but now it looks slam-dunk real to me. Do you think that the quality of the first photo allowed you to buy it cheaper?
Could be because of the quality of the photo that the seller posted. He didn't give a good description either. I have three different photos of this same shot. One from farther away showing the catcher and umpire, on in the middle, and this one showing mostly Mantle. Can never have enough of the Mick!