Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Jason brochu on December 2, 2019 at 4:15pm

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Zarelli on December 2, 2019 at 4:24pm

I do not believe either is authentic.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on December 2, 2019 at 4:26pm

This may possibly be a reproduction that’s been roughed up a little bit to appear more “real”.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Randy on December 2, 2019 at 5:57pm

Bogus!!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on December 2, 2019 at 8:58pm

The Ruth looks like a stamp to me - my guess was a 1930's repro but I could not find the same sig.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jason brochu on December 2, 2019 at 9:20pm

My guess it was too good to be true

• ▶ Reply