Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by TasunkaVitko on July 28, 2022 at 2:18am

WOW, nice autograph, thanks for help :) its off then

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steverino on July 28, 2022 at 9:44am

James, do you recall when your IP photo was signed?  It looks similar to this late '70s TTM of mine that I've been trying to "authenticate" forever.  What's your opinion?  Thank you.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Zarelli on July 28, 2022 at 11:01am

The "Best wishes Steve" looks secretarial IMO. And, honestly the "To Jim looks like secretary too. If you can read every single letter clearly, it's usually the secretary. Eastwood hasn't signed that neatly in a very long time.

The photo posted by Tasunka looks consistent with modern Eastwood sigs. I think it's likely ok. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mikex on July 28, 2022 at 11:07am

I agree. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steverino on July 31, 2022 at 6:08am

Thanks for your feedback, Steve!  I thought if James' example was indeed an IP autograph, this might have a chance.  Agreed, it's nothing like his more recent signatures, but mine was signed - by someone - over 40 years ago.  I think we can all agree that Clint, at times, can be tough to call and it doesn't hurt to ask questions.  Here's another from the same time period - late '70s.  Enjoy your day!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve on July 28, 2022 at 9:34am

Very nice.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Tim Male on July 28, 2022 at 1:16pm

I too think this looks pretty typical. The 1 addressed to Steve certainly looks like the usual ttm secretarial. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dan Morris on July 28, 2022 at 2:01pm

I have to agree with others, the original posted photo looks like a rushed typical recent signature and the one from James is TTM secretarial

• ▶ Reply