Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Autographtastic on November 28, 2023 at 11:41am

I admit, it looks off and I thought that when I first saw it. That's why I said I'm not convinced it's genuine. However, when I compared it with exemplars, I thought there might be a case for it being an unusual but authentic autograph. The 1974 TLS is a very odd signature. My point was that if the TLS is genuine, it's possible the OP could be as well. Judging by others feedback, I'm off the mark with this one ....

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on November 28, 2023 at 12:01pm

It's worth discussing. Most things are, never worry about that.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on November 28, 2023 at 5:53am

Don't like it...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by spaceman on November 28, 2023 at 12:38pm

Here is a genuine John signed in 1975. Some similarities, with the John part of the autograph  in question.  I am not happy with the autograph discussed  here. Or could it be that is because it is signed in crayon.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Autographtastic on November 29, 2023 at 4:16pm

Thanks for your thoughts. 

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page