We're testing design changes tonight. Things may look or act weird on and off.
Hang in there.

John Lennon & Paul McCartney authentic?

Hi all! Just wondering if anyone could weigh in as to the authenticity of these signatures. At first glance they looked okay to me but I'd like to see what everyone here thinks. Thanks in advance!

Tags: McCartney, Paul

Views: 682

Attachments: No photo uploads here

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by James on July 26, 2016 at 9:51pm
I think Paul's autograph may be fine, but Lennon's looks a bit too neat to me.
Permalink Reply by Paul on July 26, 2016 at 9:54pm

Look ok to me.

Permalink Reply by Ryan on July 26, 2016 at 10:12pm

Thank you for your opinion. 

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on July 26, 2016 at 9:58pm

Both signatures aren't authentic in my opinion.

Permalink Reply by Paul on July 26, 2016 at 10:00pm

Listen to him.

Permalink Reply by Paul on July 26, 2016 at 10:01pm

Is that because of the long Paul is much later that the lennon.

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on July 26, 2016 at 10:05pm
I had seen it before. It's the work of a known forger.
Permalink Reply by Ryan on July 26, 2016 at 10:11pm

Thank you both for the insight certainly learned a bit here myself.

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on July 26, 2016 at 11:13pm
I agree with Ballroom.
Permalink Reply by Ryan on July 27, 2016 at 6:05pm
Thanks Steve!
Permalink Reply by wascher on July 27, 2016 at 4:03am

This is an "Erick McKay Special".

Pic I saved from a previous sale of this item

Permalink Reply by wascher on July 27, 2016 at 4:21am

The other item you asked about is also from this forger.  http://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/freddie-mercury-paul...

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service