Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by James on July 26, 2016 at 9:51pm

I think Paul's autograph may be fine, but Lennon's looks a bit too neat to me.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on July 26, 2016 at 9:54pm

Look ok to me.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ryan on July 26, 2016 at 10:12pm

Thank you for your opinion. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on July 26, 2016 at 9:58pm

Both signatures aren't authentic in my opinion.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on July 26, 2016 at 10:00pm

Listen to him.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on July 26, 2016 at 10:01pm

Is that because of the long Paul is much later that the lennon.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on July 26, 2016 at 10:05pm

I had seen it before. It's the work of a known forger.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ryan on July 26, 2016 at 10:11pm

Thank you both for the insight certainly learned a bit here myself.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on July 26, 2016 at 11:13pm

I agree with Ballroom.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ryan on July 27, 2016 at 6:05pm

Thanks Steve!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by wascher on July 27, 2016 at 4:03am

This is an "Erick McKay Special".

Pic I saved from a previous sale of this item

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by wascher on July 27, 2016 at 4:21am

The other item you asked about is also from this forger.  http://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/freddie-mercury-paul...

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page