Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by David Smith on November 2, 2022 at 5:00am

Hi what's people's thoughts on this please?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by eddy on November 2, 2022 at 9:38am

There are certainly characteristics of L & H here.  However, that uniformly applied ink looks rather fresh from what I can see.  The signatures also look very smooth....perhaps "unnatura"l.  Sigs look perfectly centered on the card.....again, "unnatural".

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by David Smith To eddy on November 2, 2022 at 9:42am

Has this on top of it

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Scott Paul on November 2, 2022 at 10:38am

In my humble opinion, that piece of paper was never in the hands of either gentleman.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by eddy on November 2, 2022 at 11:33am

Now seeing the inscription as well, I'd give it a very definite "no"....not authentic.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Nick Dimeo on November 2, 2022 at 8:00pm

100% Not authentic

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by KaiMi To Nick Dimeo on November 3, 2022 at 2:40am

+ 1

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by rob kunne on November 11, 2022 at 11:39pm

why don't you ask a free opinion by dave tomlinson? he is the number one on laurel and hardy autographs. the autographs you posted looks good at first but the hardy finish says fake to me. just google dave or david tomlinson on laurel and hardy autographs. good luck!

• ▶ Reply