Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Daniel Alayof on August 22, 2019 at 11:34am

+1 
There is no "u" here (if there is a "u" here, then part of the "a" is missing). If it's real, then it's a rushed 1993 example. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on August 22, 2019 at 11:39am

I think the1993 is real but I wouldn't want it. I rather a TPA not cert it. One of those cases where they should give the submittor the authentication fee back.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on August 22, 2019 at 12:05pm

it could very well be authentic.  It's one of those that I wouldn't want no matter who blesses it, however.  One of the things that concerned me, and I admit its pretty subtle, is the "ar".  It looks spot on in the PSA one that Ballroom is showing, but not so typical in the one in the OP.  All explainable by assuming less than ideal signing conditions, I suppose.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Daniel Alayof on August 22, 2019 at 12:11pm

Agree, the "ar" is spot on in the PSA one, but the "ar" in the one in the OP is so atypical. Usually we see "ar" like in the OP in fakes.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joe W. on August 22, 2019 at 1:31pm

I agree with terrier.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on August 22, 2019 at 2:03pm

I agree, Terrier, that the “ar” part is concerning.  That area in particular looked the most concerning to me actually, even more so than the “hump t”.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on August 22, 2019 at 1:58pm

Nice example for comparison, Ballroom.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ru007 on August 23, 2019 at 8:55pm

Hi BallroomDays67 Is the one you posted authentic in your opinion? Both the op and the one you posted the humps look a bit wide to my novice eyes

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on August 23, 2019 at 10:34pm

In looking at the signature in total, I think it's real. Here's a CD that someone received for calling in to Rockline at the time of the album's release.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Daniel Alayof on August 23, 2019 at 10:43pm

This is an authentic example

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ru007 on August 23, 2019 at 10:50pm

Thanks I’m still learning, I’m probably focusing too much on the wide hump and not talking the time to view the whole signature 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on August 22, 2019 at 11:41am

It's signed by the band as well.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• Next ›
• Page