We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.
Tags:
+1
There is no "u" here (if there is a "u" here, then part of the "a" is missing). If it's real, then it's a rushed 1993 example.
I think the1993 is real but I wouldn't want it. I rather a TPA not cert it. One of those cases where they should give the submittor the authentication fee back.
it could very well be authentic. It's one of those that I wouldn't want no matter who blesses it, however. One of the things that concerned me, and I admit its pretty subtle, is the "ar". It looks spot on in the PSA one that Ballroom is showing, but not so typical in the one in the OP. All explainable by assuming less than ideal signing conditions, I suppose.
Agree, the "ar" is spot on in the PSA one, but the "ar" in the one in the OP is so atypical. Usually we see "ar" like in the OP in fakes.
I agree, Terrier, that the “ar” part is concerning. That area in particular looked the most concerning to me actually, even more so than the “hump t”.
Hi BallroomDays67 Is the one you posted authentic in your opinion? Both the op and the one you posted the humps look a bit wide to my novice eyes
This is an authentic example
Thanks I’m still learning, I’m probably focusing too much on the wide hump and not talking the time to view the whole signature
Posted by CJCollector on October 30, 2024 at 3:13pm 1 Comment 0 Likes
Posted by CJCollector on October 28, 2024 at 6:29pm 0 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by CJCollector on October 27, 2024 at 5:37am 2 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin. Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service