Views: 1152

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It makes sense. He doubts that the LOA is fake because it isn’t the first time Roger certed that particular style.

Are there any examples of that by chance?

Exactly.

I m not recording how many errors i have seen and how many auctions were withdrawn from big sites that had his coa or QO. 

Errors are happening and this is a typical one. 

I also don’t think that it’s authentic. 

This guy is responsable for several fakes

I think I’ve seen a few of them.

Totally different style here: https://www.sothebys.com/en/buy/auction/2025/rock-pop/the-beatles-9

Could be good but I have more doubts, too.

resembles the So Cal forgery style (not the one in the OP, that one is highly questionable also)

Bogus...

"fake style"?

I am still working on "false style" - I don't get it. And everyone says the OP is no good? The papers? I must reread.

The Pepper autograph (OP) has a certain part that is certainly a style that Paul never wrote. I have seen quite a few of them over the years. That's what I call "false style" - it is not his style.

The second link I posted from Sothebys with the Abbey Road is a different style. It could be good but parts look exactly like other known styles that here mostly are regarded as fake.

My problem is - if us armchair experts see the faults then a so called expert who charges money for QO and COAs must know this as well because the value of this item increases through the COA. I have no problem that the Abbey road could be ranked as good because it is 50:50 and then you may have an opinion that differs - but the Pepper is s*** if you look at the full picture. 

In these days we have to recognise a fake (as above) AND a pre-printed autographs based on genuine signatures (as the Dollar bill) and the hobby is getting worse and worse.

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service