https://www.ebay.com/itm/136532301730?_skw=beatles+signed+-pp+-prin...
I dont believe this being authentic.
Tags:
It makes sense. He doubts that the LOA is fake because it isn’t the first time Roger certed that particular style.
Are there any examples of that by chance?
Exactly.
I m not recording how many errors i have seen and how many auctions were withdrawn from big sites that had his coa or QO.
Errors are happening and this is a typical one.
I also don’t think that it’s authentic.
This guy is responsable for several fakes
I think I’ve seen a few of them.
Totally different style here: https://www.sothebys.com/en/buy/auction/2025/rock-pop/the-beatles-9
Could be good but I have more doubts, too.
resembles the So Cal forgery style (not the one in the OP, that one is highly questionable also)
Bogus...
"fake style"?
I am still working on "false style" - I don't get it. And everyone says the OP is no good? The papers? I must reread.
The Pepper autograph (OP) has a certain part that is certainly a style that Paul never wrote. I have seen quite a few of them over the years. That's what I call "false style" - it is not his style.
The second link I posted from Sothebys with the Abbey Road is a different style. It could be good but parts look exactly like other known styles that here mostly are regarded as fake.
My problem is - if us armchair experts see the faults then a so called expert who charges money for QO and COAs must know this as well because the value of this item increases through the COA. I have no problem that the Abbey road could be ranked as good because it is 50:50 and then you may have an opinion that differs - but the Pepper is s*** if you look at the full picture.
In these days we have to recognise a fake (as above) AND a pre-printed autographs based on genuine signatures (as the Dollar bill) and the hobby is getting worse and worse.
© 2025 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service