Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Bjarne Soderholm on October 30, 2011 at 4:56pm

I do not think they are genuine.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by A.B. on October 31, 2011 at 4:12am

Hi Bjarne,

do you have sigs from that era in your collection to compare with?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bjarne Soderholm on October 31, 2011 at 6:45pm

No I don't. It's just my gut feeling that tells me that they are not  genuine.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mark Jones on November 4, 2011 at 6:18am

i don't think these are genuine. The signatures are not the way Floyd signed in 1971

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by A.B. on November 4, 2011 at 6:59am

I would like to see some examples from that era to compare them to.

All I have is this 1968 signed album from the R&R auction in September 2010...and I think these signatures match pretty well.

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mark Jones on November 4, 2011 at 8:16am

the Gilmour and Mason are way out I would say compared to the 68 example.

The only signature I would agree on is the Waters signature.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by A.B. on November 4, 2011 at 9:07am

In my opinion the Masons are VERY alike...apart from the tail end of the signature.

But hey, I guess we have to agree to disagree :)

Your input is appreciated. I hope someone can provide some other late 60´s/early70´s signatures that lead us in the right direction. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mark Jones on November 4, 2011 at 11:11am

It appears that Nick only used the swirl at the end of his signature when he signed first name only.

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• pink floyd 1.jpg, 15 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by A.B. on November 4, 2011 at 1:09pm

That might be a pattern for the few sets shown here, but in the 2nd set Ted has postetd he didn´t use the swirl in his first name only signature at all.

The former owner of the autographs said he did a 20 minute interview with the band after a show in Germany. So imo the autographs weren´t rushed...may be Nick gave him a very nice sig with a swirl after his last name, because they gave the autographs in a relaxed atmosphere?!

I know...could be true, could be not...

Plus the Nick signature is on the backside of the Rick & David signature. Would a forger actually do this?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by A.B. on November 4, 2011 at 10:04am

I found two other sets from the 67/68 era, I believe. The sets are from past R&R auctions.

One interesting fact is the tail in the Mason sigs. This seems to be a not so uncommon way he used to sign his name.

 

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ted Leong on November 4, 2011 at 11:03am

Here are two that I bought with signatures from the 60's:

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Zarelli on November 4, 2011 at 11:48am

I do not know the first thing about Pink Floyd signatures.

To my untrained eye, these all appear to have been signed by the same hand. Same flow and pressure.

Look at the top of the D in Richard and the top of the T in Waters. They are the same.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• …
• 5
• Next ›
• Page