PSA DNA Quick Opinion says this isnt good need to know asap if its legit

%24_12.jpg

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Mendy Furst on December 26, 2018 at 11:42am

PSA DNA quick opinion

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on December 26, 2018 at 11:55am

You could change the thread title to include "Quick Opinion".

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on December 26, 2018 at 11:54am

I don't uh..not into Trump's auto but from what I have seen this looks atypical at best. Terrier I believe will know much more.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mendy Furst on December 26, 2018 at 11:56am

DO you have terrier as a friend? Can u ask him to check this out?

Thanks!

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on December 26, 2018 at 12:00pm

Hello, why not leave a message or comment on his page's "wall" linked here and ask him to take a look and/or leave a link to this thread?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on December 26, 2018 at 12:03pm

Ive said before that these signatures are impossible to authenticate, however, in this case, I agree with PSA. It is junk, like most of these rushed attempts.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mendy Furst on January 6, 2019 at 7:27am

Hey Terrier do you know ronald reagan autographs?

How does this look? Ronald%20reagan.png

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Zarelli on December 26, 2018 at 12:43pm

As has been stated before, if you want a Trump signature that can be authenticated with a reasonable level of certainty, go for an older full signature in a book. There will be secretary signatures and fakes, but you have a much better odds of accurately sussing them out.

If you are a Trump supporter, I don't even know why you'd want this one. Even if the signature was real -- which I doubt -- It's an ugly magazine with an unflattering caricature.