We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

PSA DNA Quick Opinion says this isnt good need to know asap if its legit

Views: 406

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

PSA DNA quick opinion

You could change the thread title to include "Quick Opinion".

I don't uh..not into Trump's auto but from what I have seen this looks atypical at best. Terrier I believe will know much more.

DO you have terrier as a friend? Can u ask him to check this out?

Thanks!

Hello, why not leave a message or comment on his page's "wall" linked here and ask him to take a look and/or leave a link to this thread?

Ive said before that these signatures are impossible to authenticate, however, in this case, I agree with PSA.  It is junk, like most of these rushed attempts.

Hey Terrier do you know ronald reagan autographs?

How does this look? Ronald%20reagan.png

As has been stated before, if you want a Trump signature that can be authenticated with a reasonable level of certainty, go for an older full signature in a book. There will be secretary signatures and fakes, but you have a much better odds of accurately sussing them out.

If you are a Trump supporter, I don't even know why you'd want this one. Even if the signature was real -- which I doubt -- It's an ugly magazine with an unflattering caricature.

Based on all of the Trump-related magazine covers I've seen, I've yet to see a flattering cover.

Lol. Fair point. That said, flattering or not, I’d go for a cover that has a real photographic image, not a childish looking cartoon caricature. :-)

Does this ronald reagan look good?

Ronald%20reagan.png

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service